draft for blog

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Summer of Sam: Final Draft

Many people throughout the world have been terrorized but in the 1970s many events occurred  that changed the image of New York City for a long time. Though the movie Summer of Sam by Spike Lee didn’t completely portray the aspects of the event realistically but it did however showed how people were behaving because of  this serial killer, the life in NYC in the 70s, and how the press was treating this event. There are many intriguing levels to how realistic this film depicts the life of NYC in the 1970s. It presents the integration of economical, political, and social class to how NYC was back then. Through this film the audience should understand what was missing that created the exact image to how things were going back when everything was going regressing.
        Realism defines many parts of the movie. It forms a relationship within the film, this allows the audience to relate with real events that is being portrayed in the movie to real life events. Realism in the movie isn’t complete because we don’t get to see the actual dirty streets and the abandoned buildings. We don’t get a feel of anything other than life amongst the Italian neighborhoods. We don’t get to see the dirty subway stations and the graffiti everywhere.  Since the 1960s things got complicated, businesses were decreasing and crime was increasing. In July 13th, 1977 there was a black out in New York City. It took a day for Con-Edison to fix the problem so everyone created a riot. In the article “Bushwick: Then and Now” by Eleanor Barkhorn, she stated how  “Arson had claimed over 1,000 buildings and the '77 blackout led to violence and looting that ruined hundreds of businesses on Broadway”. This gives an understanding to how hectic it was and how people were going senseless. The mass looting in the streets of  New York City led to people stealing things from the stores and organizing arson. This falls under the economical status of NYC at that time. It may be certain that if the economical standards back then were in a good state people would’ve not behaved so barbaric. People who were involved in the looting were of tawdry style be due to the looting happening in places like Harlem, Bushwick and South Bronx. In a very detailed article Joyce Purnick describes how some things happened. She mentioned some steps of Mayor Beame and the hectic chaotic crowd that wondered in the city. Purnick declared that“Only later did we learn about the extent of the chaos and looting in the South Bronx, Harlem and in Bushwick.”. the conditions of the subways were a major disappointment and during the blackout many people were stuck in trains. however the train alone was just disastrous, and “The rapid transit infrastructure of NYC in the 1970s was suffering from the effects of ‘deferred maintenance’ initiatives started in the 1960s.” (Mark S. Feinman).
    As the realism of the movie is in mere details, it is a obvious thought that not everything happened in accordance to realism in NYC without the movie. As many people know, the 1970s were of nothing but troubled people that accompanied troubled events. What the movie didn’t show was how stagflation was a situation that stagnated NYC in a financial form. Stagflation is when the inflation rate of a country is increasing and the growth of the economy is decreasing. During this time Richard Nixon was the president and a major impact was the oil crises in 1973. This led to increase in prices, also as the desperate need of lower class people to act very irrational. Along with the economy dragging people, the summer was another factor that led to many problems in the 1970s. Not only did the looting play a major effect but everything else before ‘77 was just an explosion awaiting to happen. Summer of 1977 was just the drop that overflowed the cup and although there are crimes in other seasons, nevertheless summer is when people tend to become more wild. The heat has a strong impact on how people behave and this became one of the many problems in the 1970s. People were already being vulgar and imprudent and in addition the crime wasn’t helping. The need for employment and the basic needs to survive drove people mad. To then have a serial killer out on the loose only made things worse. People were going crazy over overpriced objects and necessities.
                   With the fiscal crisis at hand in 1975 and the oil crisis the Midwest left in 1973, political views withing the Democratic was rampant. Mayor Beame had major competition during the last term. He had six opponents and Edward I. Koch was one of them. “the blackout served him well. He radiated indignation, accused Mr. Beame of losing control of the streets, said he should have asked the governor to call in the National Guard. “ mentioned Joyce. In some aspects crisis in a certain area can affect a politician whether the effect is good or bad (Purnick). Nevertheless, NYC made its way through the blackout, the dirty streets and the political confrontations.
    The political view tied in with the economical status of NYC back then. Ford who was the president who was paying attention to foreign matters. When Beame asked the Federal for support Ford mentioned to the City to “drop dead” mentioned in the Daily News :The Bronx is Burning: The politics of turmoil”.  But then again it was very controversial due to the economic depleting because of lack of foreign raw materials. As stated before, the oil crises became a huge problem and in order to start somewhere it was best to begin helping the economy in order for the people back in the 70s could receive employment. With the economy rising the crime could perhaps decrease, and that was the hope many people then shared. As far as music in the city; CBGB was a punk rock venue in which a lot of young teenagers went to express their feelings. They created riots amongst each other in order to escape from the authorities. There was always a band on set singing or screaming about the unfortunate events in life and how they’re misunderstood. These were major events that took place in NYC  which is non existent today.
    Political views in Summer of Sam is very stern because of the large community. Everyone obviously is out on a hunt for this killer.  People barely sleep and the press continues to stress this issue. They provide him with various names such as the .44 Caliber Killer or The Son of Sam. Everyone due to their same ethnicity share the same common emotion of fear and the same common belief of justice towards this horrendous killer that has terrorized NYC.  In the movie the only political view was based on the killer, anything else wasn’t being showed because the movie centralized on this killer and the fear he brought to the neighborhood.
    With social class there was the obvious fact that more than 50% of the neighborhood in the Bronx were Italian people. Many of them were lower class people who had a lot of interpersonal issues. Many of them dealt with drugs such as Vinny and the rest of his friends. As seen one of his friends sells drugs meanwhile the other mouths homophobic remarks. The realism of the movie mostly assembled around Vinny and his Wife Diana. As the topic of infidelity doesn’t age, Spike Lee made sure to correlate Vinny’s infidelity with witnessing who the real killer was. In the film there was a shot in which shows when Vinny and his friends are at a dead end, his friends assume that Vinny saw the real killer. Vinny gets scared and demands of them to not spread things around or else he would be face with The Son of Sam. It seems as if people then and as well as today are in fear, if you were to see something most likely you wouldn’t say anything. It is how things work, due to fear of your own death people are willing to keep things quiet.
    Ratting out your local killer isn’t the only fear people faced in this movie. Also the increase in crime. The fact that females had to change their hair color due to the killer’s personal preference of shoulder length brown hair young females. It shows how fragile the human mind is, the fact that one single person could terrorized a whole city. It doesn’t deal with a social class but with humanity as a whole. As New York City grew in fear of the killer’s inhumane act, the killer grew fonder of fearing the city that never sleeps. Within the Italian Americans being different doesn’t cut it. Being homosexual also isn’t right as well. People in the movie mainly focused on catching the killer, attacking those who differ from them, using drugs, and having a lot of sex. In certain sequences a portrayal of certain clubs and hot spots for the locals such as CBGB which was in Saint Marks and Studio 54. In these hot spots you can see the night life settle into this fascinating trend of drug users and sex addicts. People of fun, as well as people of trouble.
    As a part of economical situation, one thing that didn’t make sense was how Vinny and his Wife lived in a middle class home that your average hair dresser and waitress could never afford. In the perspective of today looking at the price of where they resided, the rent must’ve been cheaper but to actually acknowledge how much they would’ve gotten pay it, it doesn’t make sense their middle class apartment. Also, along with the apartment there are places and cars in which they visit and own. Both of which it would be hard for them to afford with the job title they both possess.
    With economical struggles, social class was a major part in this. In the Bronx which was where the movie was located. Aside from the murder victims which are scattered across the boroughs, the Bronx played an important setting in this movie. They showed abuse against homosexuals, and Hispanics. Scenes in which they were pulling a Puerto Rican from his car because he seemed like a suspect. Things like this were going on back then. In which people began to go against each other and had forgotten to use logic. Instead, they were pointing fingers and making matters worse.   
    People then became more frightened because they knew that now that he had killed a young female that had blonde hair, they were not safe anymore. The hunger of the cops and detectives to catch this killer grew more and more. And every time they wasted more money in order to catch him. The crime was still rising and people were still being vulgar. Prostitutes were still on the corner and subway trains were nastier than ever. This is something that Spike Lee left out, that even after they had caught him it took a while for NYC to wipe out the rugged look that hovered over the city. The addition to infidelity was just a symbol of entertainment, however, there were a lot unfaithfulness going around. Women were dropping dimes on their husbands due to infidelity on their husbands behalf and vice versa.
    In the 70s not only disco was in style but also the movie Star Wars and this is one element that the director missed out. Back then they would attend theaters and after the couples would go into the love drive and suddenly the killer will slowly chose his victims, or even after night clubs. As far as the weather goes, even today when summer is approaching people tend to get over excited. The director did a good depiction of the hot weather and how people were out in the streets in titillating outfits. Women then were degraded because of their positions in life. They were still being looked down upon and many of them we see in films that are related to the 1970s are mostly prostitutes. In this film the weather is a symbol to all the dark things that could happen and being that this was a real story in NYC it only portrays the danger and the careless attitude many New Yorkers carry.
    Drugs alone is a major problem, the main thing that maybe created a  hole in NYCs society back in the 1970s. Drugs alone is a major idea however, the train station in 1999 which was the year that Spike Lee delivered and created the film Summer of Sam. Also in the summer of 1977 a killer was on the loose however in NYC the West Nile like virus was working its way through Queens and Manhattan. Many people feared for their lives.
    Though many things differed in 1977 than from 1999, it is obvious that social class has come a long way and the economical crisis has changed from the 70s to the 90s. It still portrays that  the film didn’t cover the complete aspects of what exactly happened in New York City during the summer of 1977, however Spike Lee did use a number of cinematic elements to depict the city’s frightful sleepless nights. 


Feinman S, Mark. "The New York City Transit Authority in the 1970s". November 2002. Web 31 May 2011. <http://www.nycsubway.org/articles/history-nycta1970s.html>

Siemaszko, Corky. “The Political of Turmoil”. The Daily News: The Bronx is Burning. August 29, 1977. Web 31 May 2011.<http://www.nydailynews.com/features/bronxisburning/battle-for-the-city/index.html>

Purnick, Joyce. “The ‘77 Blackout: Inside the Command Center”. July 11, 2007. Web 31 May 2011. <http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/07/11/the-77-blackout-inside-the-command-center/>

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Blog 18: Report on major research paper



            There were many difficulties I had to faced in the process of writing my first draft. I looked for so many statistics yet again I failed to incorporate them due to lack of primary resources. Also it was difficult looking for major events that made a huge impact in 1999, in order to compare and contrast it to the year of 1977. The year in which the movie I chose, Summer of Sam by Spike Lee. However, I did manage to find a really good source in the Daile News article that had a website with information of the killer in that year. There were other articles in which I didn’t have access to because I wasn’t enrolled in the website’s page. I have included some variety sentences unconsciously of course. When I went over my work I noticed I didn’t have to struggle to add a few of these sentences for I had already incorporated them.
            Topic sentences helped me focused my paragraphs with exactly what I was talking about. It helped me focus as well as keep my essay in order. At then end I did struggle and kept out of my norms. I do feel that it was a poor draft but it will impose for a better final paper. I do recognize my weaknesses in my research however I will make sure my final draft includes my resources and the mla format.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Blog 17: Minority Report, Oedipus, and free will

As we are restricted of many self pleasures in the world, we are not able to explore such desires. In the movie Minority Report, Oedipus the King and “Free Will and Determinism in the World of Minority Report” portrays ways in how we can determine whether humans have control over free will or not. Free will is constantly manipulated by something or someone. As consequences follows one knows that being cautious of ones’ action can eventually gain control of free will.
    In the movie Minority Report there is a scene in which the main character walks through the mall and there are 3D screens that are scanning his eyes. These screens are calling him by his name to call for his attention. One thing I noticed is the control these Ads have over you and how they can speak to you. If you wouldn’t want to spend money and you’d find yourself with these ads how will people resist temptation when it is being shoved in their face? There are those who resist then there are those who give in. People have the will and power to control their wants. It’s difficult if  you’re being swarmed with a thousand ads and your crime penalty would be spending over budget. Then again, your wants are being injected in your head. It is not what you really want, it’s what they want you to want. I believe this is when free will comes at hand. You’ll be making your actual decision.
    In Oedipus the King, Oedipus wasn’t given the free will. His destiny was manipulated by these oracle-like people who told his biological father of his disastrous fate. When he explained his fate he left in order to stop him from killing his adopted father; killing his biological father. Oedipus wasn’t granted the will from the beginning since he was given away. Had his father not decided to sent him to get “killed” he would’ve been able to not fulfill his destiny. In the article “Free Will and Determinism in the World of Minority Report” Michael Huemer explains events in Minority Report that impacts or effects humans free will. He mentions in page 104 how “even though the robot controls its own actions, it has only one possibility to open it at any given time.” People control their actions but if others weren’t to extend the possibilities of doing what you want to then free will wouldn’t be as difficult to interpret or decoy. Everyday we are given the chance to take actions on our belts. However, the people that surround us creates these escapades that only restrict us further. It’s a form of temptation to do what’s not supposed to be done to later on be punished for as a consequence. We do have free will, but others also have free will upon us.

Thursday, May 12, 2011

Blog 15: Minority Report response



         If there is a random search for security purposes then I feel it shouldn’t be a problem for privacy to be invaded.  Security shouldn’t be measured upon personal needs. When 9/11 happened many people were afraid to come out of their shelves, but I’m sure that if we were taking the actions we were taking then, now, maybe 9/11 could’ve been avoided. Then again, it is justifiable due to people not expecting this. Because we are too engaged with our personal life we could be at risk of saving those surrounding us from a tragedy. I understand that people need their privacy and that certain things should be kept within your confinement. However, when it comes to other people’s lives I feel like your privacy should be given up for the sake of your life and others. 

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Archives Project Essay

Lismilda Paula
April 2011
English 103.
There were many problems going on in the 1970s. One of them was planned shrinkage. Back then there was an economical crisis that was beating Americans on their soles. We came out of Vietnam war to just get hit with an unemployment increasing rate. Roger Starr being the Housing Administrator is being looked at as one of the negative examples who are infiltrating the decrease in housing amongst minorities.
  The streets were filled with sex, drugs, and crime and this plagued the areas in where the minorities were settled in. The down fall of one agency affected the other. Since 13.7% of cops which are 4,879 were laid off, the streets became more dangerous. There were less cops protecting these neighborhoods. This led to the increase in crime rates. A perfect example as to how NYC looked in the 1970s is the movie Taxi Driver. In this movie there are shots in which the main character is in his car and there are prostitutes on the streets. Back then it was called Red  Light District. The subways were a disaster and there was nothing but junkies doing drugs out in the open. One could say that this was one of the most horrible times in NYC. Many people believed that President Ford wasn’t doing anything to meet with these matters at hand. 
 Slums are places in which poor people reside due to lack of a stable economical income. The slums were filled with minorities and this is where classification was more brutal especially with housing. Though slums are just a derogative term that’s what Roger Starr considered these places.
Planned Shrinkage wasn’t always good. Even if today, someone would try to do a planned shrinkage it wouldn’t benefit the people. Not then and certainly not today. The idea of moving people from one neighborhood  into another neighborhood seems uncomfortable and this was the problem back in 1970s. Removing all of the necessities of a city was intolerable. Eventually, Roger managed to deduct all the major resources a city needs to survive. Resources such as Police Officers, Fireman, Department of Social Service, and many other agencies. This plan only benefitted the rich people. Poor people were being hoodwinked into other places that were considered not worthy of living. Even worse, their pocket would rot due to lack of money. Roger Starr, the head of the City Housing and Development Administration, went with the idea of removing people from South Bronx and Brownsville into other neighborhoods (most of the time it would be buildings in bad conditions). 
Destroying where they once lived and renovating everything completely. Demolishing everything wasn’t a debacle, it was raising the rent so that the people that were once there could not come back. This is why many people were against this idea. Giving these luxurious apartments to the rich folks. Providing himself with a great deal of money. What it took for Starr to renovate could be replaced with the amount of rent money the upper class would be paying monthly. This idea was mainly used as a mean to discard the minorities from living in the city.  As previously mentioned, there are many pictures of how the 1970s really looked in NYC. That being stated, Starr along with the Republicans believed that minorities were the ones who were responsible for such destructions in the city. 
The representative of the Harlem District, Frederick Samuels (chairman) mentioned the planned shrinkage idea being the worse. He stated it was a “genocidal, inhumane, arrogant, and irresponsible” idea. It doesn’t consider nor favor the people. It seems like a hoax to trick them out of their long time homes and placing them into places that was very slum-like. People also suggested the “bridge ban” and this idea was turned away by the Republicans. In 6 Councilmen Demand Starr Quit HDA Post, March 05, 1976 a letter was put out. This letter portrayed the disgust people were feeling towards this idea. Many demanded that Starr wasn’t thinking about the people. Samuels was strongly confirming for his  pullout due to Roger Starr taking advantage of the fact that these people were minorities. It would be obvious as to why he defends the minorities. Samuels being chairman of the Harlem District, he sees these people struggle for a living. He recognizes the engagement of struggling for survival. 
In the article Joint Statement by Governor Carey and Mayor Abraham D. Beame on Thursday, May, 15, 1975 it was declared that “ We call upon them to reconsider, and we call upon the President, in the great tradition of the President before, not to abandon the people in a time of economic crisis.”  People were begging for President Ford to stick by them, and to try to make everything better. It was said that Ford was attending to foreign matters rather than recognizing what was going on in the City. Meanwhile cuts were being made, the balance of the budget was being handled properly and there was a liquidity problem in the city. Though the idea of planned shrinkage was helping the economy somewhat, there was still an increase in unsanitary conditions in the City. People were being chaotic and didn’t know how to behave. It was easier to commit a crime because there were barely any Police patrolling these neighborhoods. Drugs were taking over along with poverty. In other words, people were placing themselves at danger’s feet before the economy got to them first.
Roger Starr didn’t believe in the Brooke Amendment. In 1937 Edward Brooke imposed the law of low income tenants to pay a specific low percentage of rent in order to accommodate their living. Starr felt that it made the “good tenants move out..”  Because it didn’t provide his own percentage of payment, Starr maybe disagree on this Amendment. Paying a lot of money for rebuilding buildings to then rent it to low income families didn’t provide him with his profits. He believed that it didn’t help the economy because people may not be giving enough. Also Starr made a statement that made an impact to how he felt about certain people. In an interview with Robert Fitch, Roger Starr mentioned “ Problems that became important, which was how to keep people from going up on the rood and doing drugs...” This is the reason why he didn’t want low class tenants living in these buildings. He explained how people were assumed to be “respectable looking like the ideal family” therefore they were forced to bring these people in. Again, using loaded words to discriminate and stereotype.  Starr was aware of the economical crisis yet he knew there should be a higher demand on rental, “I mean, we have to take care of people who can’t take care of themselves” in a way it is very degrading how these people can’t care for themselves. The way he worded that made it seem like he felt obliged to care for those who can’t care for themselves. 
It seems like Roger Starr is thinking more of the people of his standards. In order to be in his position he must think in every aspect and spectrum. To make a decision that only benefits rich people can bring a lot of controversy and demeaning words to your name. Which is exactly where he placed himself. This plan for the time was a complete failure. New York City was already at its worse times, to then bring more of a hard time upon those less fortunate can be very hard. I’m sure good intentions came from wanting to better the economy but then again stepping on other peoples’ toes to get there isn’t the correct way of doing things. Planned shrinkage should’ve been thoughtfully delivered and altered in other ways that wouldn’t affect other people. 

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Special Activity: MOMI


-List of facts
-       I learned how audio works in films
-       I learned how the oldest video game worked
-       I got to see the early generation of female and male actors
-       I learned how different masks are made
-       The difference in makeup they used back then and now.
-       Special effects in scary movies.


In the early ages in film there were barely African Americans.  We noticed how every person in the early ages that wasn’t American was a type caster. May Lee Wong was a type caster as a prostitute. Shirley Temple always played as a young beautiful child. 

Monday, May 2, 2011

Draft of Archive Essay

Lismilda Paula
April 2011
English 103.
There were many problems going on in the 1970s. One of them was planned shrinkage. Back then there was an economical crisis that was beating Americans on their soles. We came out of Vietnam war to just get hit with an unemployment increasing rate. Roger Starr being the Housing Administrator is being looked at as one of the negative examples who are infiltrating the decrease in housing amongst minorities.
The streets were filled with sex, drugs, and crime and this plagued the areas in where the minorities were settled in. The down fall of one agency affected the other. Since 13.7% of cops which are 4,879 were laid off, the streets became more dangerous. There were less cops protecting these neighborhoods. This led to the increase in crime rates. A perfect example as to how NYC looked in the 1970s is the movie Taxi Driver. In this movie there are shots in which the main character is in his car and there are prostitutes on the streets. Back then it was called Red  Light District. The subways were a disaster and there was nothing but junkies doing drugs out in the open. One could say that this was one of the most horrible times in NYC. Many people believed that President Ford wasn’t doing anything to meet with these matters at hand. 
Slums are places in which poor people reside due to lack of a stable economical income. The slums were filled with minorities and this is where classification was more brutal especially with housing. 





......Not finished.